The Renewal RecordSchool renewal guide

California charter renewal guide · Updated September 18, 2026

Intellectual Virtues Academy High: 2027 Charter Renewal Guide

A source-based briefing for school leaders, board members, families, and other stakeholders preparing for Intellectual Virtues Academy High's next charter renewal.

AuthorizerLos Angeles County Office of Education
Current charter termThrough June 30, 2027
2026 CDE categoryMiddle Performing

This independent guide organizes public information for renewal preparation. It is not an authorizer finding, legal opinion, rating, or prediction of the school's renewal outcome.

Renewal context

What the public record says now

LACOE records indicate that IVA High's current charter term runs through June 30, 2027. The California Department of Education places the school in the Middle Performing Category for the 2026 renewal cycle.

A middle-category school may be renewed for a five-year term. The category provides a viable statutory pathway, but renewal is not automatic. The authorizer may still examine the school's academic performance, fiscal condition, governance, legal compliance, attendance, enrollment, and capacity to implement its program.

The practical task for IVA High is to connect its genuine educational strengths to a complete, consistent public record while resolving foreseeable questions before they are framed in an authorizer staff report.

Assets to carry into renewal

Start with the school's strongest evidence.

01

Distinctive educational model

IVA High's program is organized around intellectual virtues such as curiosity, carefulness, courage, humility, open-mindedness, and perseverance. Its LCAP describes a comprehensive college-preparatory program that includes honors and dual-enrollment opportunities.

02

Family confidence

The 2026–27 LCAP reports six consecutive years of parent satisfaction at 97 percent or higher and 98 percent agreement in fall surveys that the school's programs promote deep thinking.

03

Growth and completion evidence

The LCAP reports above-national-average growth across multiple NWEA data sets, an 87 percent graduation rate overall, and strong participation and completion in dual-enrollment coursework.

Preparation signals

Items leadership should reconcile early.

These are preparation prompts drawn from public records, not conclusions about renewal eligibility or school quality.

01

Attendance evidence

The 2026–27 LCAP reports chronic absenteeism at 51 percent against a 27.9 percent baseline, while ADA is reported at 88 percent. Leadership should be able to document the accuracy, causes, interventions, implementation, and subsequent results behind those figures.

02

Fiscal and enrollment narrative

The LCAP projects $2,123,212 in revenue and $2,270,111 in spending for 2026–27, a difference of $146,899. The renewal record should reconcile that plan with enrollment assumptions, cash, reserves, multiyear projections, and corrective decisions.

03

Subgroup and program proof

A small-school model can produce meaningful growth while also creating volatile year-to-year metrics. IVA should present disaggregated evidence carefully, distinguish statistically stable findings from small-cohort variation, and connect program actions to measurable outcomes.

04

One coherent record

The charter petition, LCAP, Dashboard data, budgets, audits, board minutes, compliance documents, and leadership testimony should describe the same priorities, progress, and remaining work.

Leadership and board discussion

Questions to answer before the authorizer asks.

  1. What is the clearest evidence that IVA's intellectual-virtues model is producing measurable academic and postsecondary outcomes?
  2. What caused the reported chronic absenteeism level, which students were most affected, and what results have recent interventions produced?
  3. How will leadership explain the relationship among enrollment, ADA, projected revenue, planned spending, cash, and multiyear sustainability?
  4. Where do subgroup results strengthen the renewal case, and where is additional evidence or intervention still required?
  5. Do board minutes demonstrate sustained oversight of attendance, academics, fiscal assumptions, compliance, and corrective action?
  6. If LACOE drafted its staff report today, which unresolved issue would be most difficult to answer with contemporaneous evidence?

Evidence file

What to assemble now

  • A dated renewal calendar with internal decision points, board actions, and responsible owners
  • Three years of academic, growth, graduation, college-readiness, attendance, and subgroup evidence
  • Attendance-intervention records that connect identified causes, implementation fidelity, and measurable results
  • Current enrollment and ADA assumptions reconciled across the LCAP, budget, cash forecast, and multiyear projection
  • Board minutes and monitoring reports showing timely oversight and corrective action
  • A source-indexed renewal evidence library so every material claim can be verified quickly

Confidential Renewal Readiness Review

A public guide can identify the questions. A confidential review tests the answers.

UCLG examines the complete academic, attendance, enrollment, governance, fiscal, compliance, and operational record through the authorizer's lens, then delivers a prioritized corrective action plan and leadership briefing.

$7,500 fixed feeApproximately 10 business days after receipt of the core documents.Request a confidential conversation(213) 254-5427